Sunday, November 29, 2015

Michael Oren: Comments Pulled from Jerusalem Post

he now denies saying this, but we will view the denial and update, but since the article has been pulled, it will be preserved here until confirmation either way is found.  

'Obama put radical Muslim values into White House' - US & Canada - News - Arutz Sheva

Former Israeli Ambassador to the US MK Michael Oren (Kulanu), a member of the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, released a particularly strong accusation against US President Barack Obama on Saturday.

Speaking on Saturday morning at a cultural event in Be'er Sheva, Oren accused Obama of "bringing radical Muslim values into the White House."

"Obama's worldview would have been problematic to any Israeli government, including a leftist government," asserted the former ambassador. "This is the first time that radical Muslim values reached the White House."

The MK said, "Obama will never say the term 'radical Islam,' because Obama was exposed to the Muslim world and its values."

His comment refers to the fact that Obama's father was a Muslim Kenyan, and he spent many years in his childhood living in Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country in the world, after his mother re-married another Muslim man.

"It is his right as president to bring into the White House a different worldview from those of his predecessors," continued Oren. "Our responsibility is to recognize this fact and act in accordance with it."

The former envoy argued that Obama "is viewed as weak in the world," 

referencing the president's lackluster foreign policy, and concluded by saying, "I won't hide it - there's no love story here" between Israel and Obama.
Oren added that the bilateral relations between Israel and the US comprise enough levels for Obama's worldview not to significantly affect the alliance.
The MK raised a storm over the summer after publishing a book accusing Obama of betraying the alliance with Israel. The book earned stern condemnation from the White House.

Saturday, November 28, 2015

Dhimmitude Status Step By Step

What does it take for a nation to accept the status of Dhimmitude for itself?

Bat Ye'or sheds light upon this for us. 

1.  The nation must place peace before and before security 
2.  The nation must accept myths about Islamic peace. 
3.  The nation must praise tolerance above safety
4.  The nation must be willing to dilute its own identity.  

Historically, Dhimmis were broken up to 2 types:

1.  The majority who accepted this status begrudgingly and fearfully
2.  The tiny minority who benefited directly from the Muslims.   These were (and are) those who gained wealth and status by making corporate or political deals with the Muslims.  Inevitably, they did so publicly by denouncing Israel, the pathological center of Islam:  hatred of Jews. 

They gained wealth and power through Arab oil and businesses, but eventually were like lambs led to the slaughter, silent due to the shock that they, themselves, were still "kaffir" and worthy of death. 

Bat Ye'or said that the greatest shock of the wealthy?

That their children were murdered along with the rest. 

It reminds me of the Jews under Hitler who organized the trainloads of Jews to the death camps, when one they were no longer needed, they, too, were boarded for death.  

Dhimmi "Betrayal" 

The wealth and acceptance among the Islamic supremacists led to cooperation in publications, oil sales, manufacturing, gun running, and so on.  They needed to always show a negative view of Israel to satisfy Islamic lust for the blood of every Jew and the annihilation of the tiny nation.  

This came, in history, through publications of anti semitism or anti-Israel (Zionism) political stances, just as today we have country after country condemning the tiny nation of Israel for not allowing Muslims to formally steal a portion of their own land, giving their sworn enemy access to their own destruction.  

BDS Today

College kids have really big feelings and these feelings are often offended and when they are, the college kids demand repercussions upon those not responsible for their hurt feelings.  One college kid curses another, and the college president is told to resign or there will be a boycott.  Said president resigns. 

College kids are really upset about "The Palestinian" situation.  

The Palestinians are, daily stabbing Jews with knives and the press reports the Palestinians as victims in these stabbings.  Although an abundance of land exists for which Palestinians could have their own nation, these Islamic lands will not suffice; neither by offer nor by acceptance:  only land in the heart of Israel is accepted. 

The college kids demand Israel give it to them and express a range of venom towards Israel, though they know not why.  

They are really upset. 

Leaders in Europe join in this chorus and blame the Islamic terror attack in Paris on the Jews (or on global warming).  

France said it will fight back. 

Yet, at the same time, it will continue to import Islamic supremacists. 

Its former president said it has lost its identity.  France is no longer France. 

According to Bat Ye'or, France cannot yet fight against Islam unless she first is unified in an identity.  

This is best exampled by the popular photo of the French father holding up his young son, explaining, 

'Son, they fight with guns, but we fight with flowers.'

As the Islamist reloads, the French male runs back to get another rose.  

That'll learn 'em.  

Friday, November 27, 2015

The Winds of War: Putin Versus Obama

Islam is the most violent supremacist ideology known to human history.  Freedom can go to hell.  

Where National Socialism blushed, Islam stands proud. 

NAZISM lasted two decades; Islam 1400 years. 

NAZISM was limited to Germans, or German-wannabes called "Arians."

Both hated Jews, but in terms of killing, Nazis are amateurs compared to Islamic supremacists, who teach their own males to be superior, and assert this superiority by demanding submission from nations where they are outnumbered by 95% of the population.  THIS is boldness. 

ISLAM has superseded all race while 

NAZISM was limited to a singular nation;  

ISLAM has superseded nationalism, races cultures and eras.  

Planned Parenthood has sought to catch up in the number of dead, but they are still far behind.  More have died at PP than under Nazis but they have a long way to go to reach ISLAM.  

PP's sale of body parts and their financial bonanza embarrasses the best of the Nazis in making bodies into lampshades, or using human hair, gold teeth, etc.  They were child's play compared to PP. 

But ISLAM has killed more than communism or any other ideology this world has ever known. 

It is a contagion that sweeps through lands, conquers everything in its path, and must be resisted both physically, and ideologically:  it must be outlawed in the United States.  

It is an ideology that is based upon sexual violence and coercion.  Its religious aspect includes sexual violence in eternity.  

Now, Turkey, an Islamist nation, has attacked Russia.  Putin will react.  

The Obama doctrine of change has led to a 400% increase in Islamic deaths in the 7 years of his administration, a continual flow of Islamic supremacists immigrating to America, and the arming of ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood, or the Islamic de jour declared "moderate" in Syria and push has about come to shove.

Putin may now make his move.

Long emboldened by the self-loathing weakness of the former world power, Russia returned to the Ukraine and is now poised to make its move in Syria, where Barak Hussein Obama has chosen one Islamic supremacy movement over another, and has done everything he can to make America Islamic, including arming Iran, and importing ISIS fighters. 

Dropping them food, ammo and deliberately minimizing their strength, he has allowed Islam to gain more power, to the death of thousands of Middle Eastern Christians, while unopposed by Congress.  

This thin-skinned effeminate deceptive leader is best seen in hosting a man wearing  a dress to the White House, our first "transgender" military leader, while Putin celebrates his 63rd birthday playing ice hockey.  

This dichotomy is about to play itself out in Syria.  

Any bets on the winner?

Our guys are limited to such a degree as to avoid any real harm to ISIS, while Putin has openly stated a desire to protect middle eastern Christians.  

Sadly, many Americans will be rooting for Putin because they want to see Obama defeated.  They've had enough. 

Regrettably, we are where Churchill was when he learned that Japan had finally attacked Pearl Harbor:  sad for the loss, but glad for the opportunity. 

It is the same with Islamic terror. 

As soon as people die, we learn that they died according to obedience to the Koran.  

Before the bodies are buried, politicians rush to say that those who were killed under the command of the Koran and in the name of Islam were not killed by Islam. 

While the frenchmen hold flowers to their children saying, "this is how we love", Islamists are reloading. 

Any bets on who wins that one?

Even the French president out-talked Obama yet reminded the people that Islamic violence wasn't Islamic and he'd even welcome more Islamists so he can have more no go zones and more Islamic rape.  

Islam is not only a religion of coercion but is one which prescribes sexual violence. 

It is a contagion that infects and destroys nations and has successfully destroyed freedom wherever it has arisen. 

It must be stopped. 

Since Islam is not only prescriptive in violence and demonstrative in violence it can only be met by violence.  Later, the ideology can be outlawed, but first it must be stopped.  

War is coming. 

Germany and Sweden are competing with Belgium to be the first nation to formally cede over sovereign territory to Islamic supremacists.  

The arming of Islam is well under way. 

Obama is doing everything he can to increase Islamic presence in the United States. 

It is an ideology of sexual violence where even in its religious aspect, the 'reward' is sexual violence against innocence.  

This is why Sweden is the Rape Capital of the West.  

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Obedient Muslims Versus Disobedient Muslims

The necessity of cartoon mentality to by pass corporate media 
Why main stream media focuses upon "Radical" Islam is to avoid offending Muslims.  I get that.

But American Thinker??

In a recent and well written article, the author traces the roots of the Islamic connection with France, as well as the more than 2, 150 officially known No Go Zones (under various names) which are areas of Sharia, welfare, mosques and crimes.

Yet, what is "radical" Islam?

How is it different from "Islam"?

Rather than a primer on Islam, which is something available at The Religion of Peace or Jihad Watch that is thorough, my question is more about ideology and the inability by some to connect the dots. Here is just a few examples:


We look at Islamic rapes of European women and recognize that this is not simply a criminal act, but a cultural act and a religious act.

Islamic rape of European women has led to the "rape epidemic" in Sweden, now dubbed "The Rape Capital of Europe" where even the fudging of statistics, or attempts to explain it away leave the even neutered statistics chilling to the bone.  Rape is so widespread among Muslims that Sweden has now opened the first "rape center for men and boys" in the world.

It is this bad.

The rapists are from dozens of nationalities and different races.

It is not racism.

It is the ideology, stupid.

The supremacist ideology that is taught in the Koran that says:

1.  Women are of 50% value of the man
2.  Islamic men are superior to all others
3.  Infidel (non Islamic) women are the reward for the man to rape
4.  Rape is even in eternity (religious)

Surprise, surprise, people do what they believe.

When Denmark television interviews Muslim men, the men do not understand  the journalists' shock at the rape of a European woman:   "what's the problem?  She was uncovered!  She's a whore!"

They are just being obedient Muslims.

Islam teaches this so they do it and unlike what Obama says, it is not a few 'psychos', it is epidemic.

When we fought the Nazis, we did so by learning the book, Mein Kampf, which helped us understand why they did what they did.

We do that which we believe.

Obama has taken "Islam" from "Islamic terror" guides for its agents.  It will have to be restored in 2016.

Domestic Violence

That Muslim men beat their wives is no surprise, either.  The Koran tells them to.

They are obedient Muslims.

In my own interviewing of Somali women accused of beating elderly patients, there was no threat I could use that showed any impact:  it was so culturally and religiously ingrained in them that they looked at me as if I was from another planet.  The patient refused to take his medication or wet his pants, so he was slapped across the face.  There was no grasping of how unacceptable this practice was.

Blowing Up Buildings

Muslims love explosives.  They are forever blowing up things.  The prettier the thing, but bigger the explosion.

Yeah, it's the ideology again:  it is in the Koran.

The Koran says that the Muslim will enter a land not favored by "Allah" and the "proof" is all the ruins.

Therefore, when they see things that are not in ruins, the Koran is wrong.

The Koran can't be wrong, so they blow up buildings.


They love the noise and the excitement.

When the Twin Towers came down, I watched the hordes of New Jersey Muslims dancing in the streets in celebration live on television.

They did what they believe.

Muslim Violence Against Muslims 

This, too, is part of the obedience of the Muslim. Psychology, it is inevitable, right through to 100% Islamic countries.

Besides the inherent psychologically predictable nature of supremacism (it must lead to violence due to the inequalities within creation) the Muslim targets the disobedient Muslim for violence, specifically death for not obeying the Koran, or even converting to Christianity.

This is the most widespread of the violence and that which gets the least coverage in MSM.  Those born into Islam who are 'secular' or disobedient, are said to be "moderate Muslims" and are sought for support against...


Yet, time and time again, the "moderate" mosques produce obedient jihadists.

ISIS Boo'oing France in Moment of Silence?  


ISIS doesn't go to sporting events so when you heard the moment of silence disrupted by thousands of voices singing "Allahu Akbar!", you heard the serenade of...

"moderate Muslims"

The myth of "radicalization" continues.

The vast majority of Muslims do not commit violence.

This is true.  It is also like saying

"In the Viet Nam war, the vast majority of Americans did not kill the Vietnamese."

Islam has its soldiers as a low percentage of its population, and its supporters, as the vast majority of its population.  Even only 1% of Muslims are Jihadi, that is more than 1,000,000 soldiers in action and this is without a call to a Caliphate!

If a true Caliphate is established and the call is given, who will respond?  Daniel Greenfield called for this as our primary target and explains why, as the ideology comes to a point of center, it poses the greatest risk to the greatest number of citizens in every location where Muslims exist. The article is here.

The obedient.

The mosque attending followers.

The ideology of Islam is a supremacist sexually violent political, social and religious system immune to criticism.  (All reformation of Islam is prescribed the death penalty).

It is the ideology.

There were Nazis.

How did we come up with a strategy to fight the Nazis?
How did we come up with a pysch eval of a man we were incapable of interviewing, yet predicted his suicide perfectly?

Some were Nazi soldiers but the vast majority were those who held to the policies and ideology of National Socialism, that is extreme left socialism defined by Germany, first.

Were there "good Nazis"?

We might call them so, but the Nazis would call them "disobedient" Nazis, or disloyal Nazis.

The ideology of Islam is a contagion that is all consuming.  It addresses how one thinks, lives, breathes and dies.

Islam is the problem.

Islam and Democracy are incompatible.

Islam and Christianity are polar opposites.

Islam's hatred of all things Jewish is said to be pathological; that is, it is within the core of its belief.  Islam is the bastard offspring of Judaism and remains in violent envy of "people of the book"; the very "book" that the koran copied. Even the most "moderate" or even "secular" Muslim I have met, I have not missed my opportunity to ask about Jews.  The sneer that instantly creases the lips is unmistakable.  The veneer of peace and tolerance cracks immediately and the interview comes to a screeching halt.

The koran teaches its followers to lie, which is why they feign anger at jihad, but jihad is not only one of the mandates of Islam, at its very core, but it is something prescribed in specific detail, including be-headings and amputations.

If you grew up being told you were superior to all others, you too would have a corporate victim status mentality, and if these lessons were repetitive and driven home with visual violence against your own mother, the impact would be pathological.  It is deep within you and even if you are "secular", learning that "your people" are victorious will cause a strong, positive emotional reaction within you.

Hence, the new 'obedient' or 'devout' Muslim is awakened.

If you listen to Barak Hussein Obama, you likely fear a Jew running into a mall strapped with bombs yelling, "Oy! Oy!", or you fear a Christian, with a "What Would Jesus Do?" bracelet, also strapped with bombs, blowing himself and you up, yelling, "What Would He do??"

Yet, no ideology in the world has ever been this explicitly violent, nor this incredibly successful as Islam has been for 1,400 years and the deaths of millions and millions around the globe.

The ideology of supremacy supersedes race, nationality and clan.

Where ever Muslims gather, there is violence, specifically, sexual violence.  When they finally die, what awaits them is the violent sexual attacks of "70 virgins" awaiting them.

The koran is a vile, disgusting self-contradictory and often juvenile poorly appropriated hodgepodge that brilliantly appeals to the most base and evil aspects of human nature.

It is the ideology that must be destroyed and offering money to Islamic supremacists, or, "Muslims" only affirms their superiority as the "jizrah" is due and the dhimmi status confirmed by your 'tolerance.'

What you think is strength, the Muslim sees as weakness.

As Paris men present flowers, Muslim men are re-loading.

Main Stream Media And Deception

Sarcasm to break the stranglehold on news 
I work in deception detection, from sunrise to sunset, and then some.

It is my life's work and it is impossible for me to "shut it down" and put my brain to sleep.

Just this morning, I woke up at 1:30AM with another "aha!" moment where I was able to identify the author of an anonymous letter sent to a company.  I knew, after working on it all afternoon with another analyst, and all night, that this would happen:  some critical point would come to me while I attempted to sleep.

I cannot turn off deception detection, yet for all the good that comes of it, there is a price to pay.

There can be something heartbreaking about certain aspects of detecting a lie.  The most widely covered theme is romantic deception, but this is really limited to one specific area where the most trauma is produced:

Where one spouse has no element of suspicion but believes that he or she has a happy marriage.  This surprise is to produce the most acute trauma including suicide, suicidal ideation, depression, anxiety, long term health issues, and so on.

This is not to minimize the agony of, for example, finding out one's suspicions are confirmed, but is to state that the most long term negative impact seems to correlate with the level of shock.

There are others, including costly mortgage fraud, car purchase fraud, and others, yet there is an overall lack of trust that can settle in, especially in a period of history where deception and propaganda rule main stream media.

There is always damage but today there is a crisis of confidence in media's reporting, itself.  It is also not new, but it appears to have gained significant traction during a time where we have learned just how much spying our government has done on its own citizens.

In my own life time, I have always been a "news hound", growing up listening to 24 hour a day CBS Newsradio 88.  As a boy, I trusted the news, and each morning, read the sports pages and a few news headlines along the way.

While a boy, I was given an early lesson in dirty journalism and struggled to understand how this worked.

In 1977, New York Mets' pitching ace, Tom Seaver, was up for a new contract and the General Manager, M. Donald Grant had held a level of contempt and resentment towards Seaver after Seaver and his wife moved to Greenwich, Connecticut and joined an exclusive country club.  Grant was of the mindset that Seaver was "rank and file" and country club was for "management upper class only", so he gave a few "tips" to sports writers to seek to bring down Seaver's value to the franchise, in the eyes of the public,  to the point of touching his popularity for the purpose of saving money.

When this failed, Grant had one reporter do what was "the unthinkable" to Seaver and mentioned Seaver's wife, Nancy, claiming "she was jealous" of Nolan Ryan's salary.  Seaver was infuriated  that his wife was brought into things, knew Grant was behind it, but still  took the bait, demanding a trade, allowing Grant to  then defend himself and say, "Yes, I know he is The Franchise and the greatest Met but he demanded a trade!  There was nothing I could do!"

Collusion between the wealthy and media goes back to the first printing press, so it is not new, but for many, it still does not sit well.

American media, year after year during the Tour De France, left a single journalist to do battle himself, against Lance Armstrong and whenever the journalist was singled out, they remained silent.  They had this amazing cancer survivor story that they were not going to bust.

More recently, this summer we have seen the crisis of confidence not just in the United States, but across the world.

"women and children refugees'
German media admitted not warning locals of the rape epidemic committed by migrants, who they called "Syrian war refugees" deliberately, so as not to "galvanize the opposing political party."  Opposing political party?  They knew that by not warning citizens, some women would be raped by the migrants, and they remained silent.  Even now when reported, one of the rapes this week was on the 13th paragraph down from the headlines.

Barak Obama publicly condemned Fox News, and not only barred certain journalists, but gained the reputation for the most "non-transparent administration ever" among journalist supporters.

Last month at a Hillary Clinton event media broke out and gave her a standing ovation.  Media did this.

Perhaps the worst, however, is the collusion between UK police and media in the Rotherdam rape crisis where up to 2,000 young girls and teens were raped by Islamic supremacists who regularly groomed and drugged them.  Even the BBC wrote that "1400 girls..." were victims, which, if you are familiar with the BBC, you likely expected them to under-report.  In Rotherham, at least 1400 girls, as young as 11 years old were raped, many multiple times, as the Islamic gangs isolated and groomed children that were in group homes, foster homes, and otherwise vulnerable.

They will suffer for the rest of their lives. Had police only warned school officials, right upon dismissal, these young girls could have been kept safe until they reached their homes.  Tania Cadogan has commented upon this more than a few times, here at the Statement Analysis blog.

Deception has a terrible price.

But why?

What could possibly be the motive for this deception via silence?

Why did police and media conspire to keep this from the public?

The perpetrators were Islamics and police feared being called "racist" and media did not want to "contribute" to racism.

Many of these children were sent home by police and social workers who scolded  them as "child prostitutes."

One woman, grown now, with children of her own, in desperate need of money for therapy, had a group start a "go fund me" for her last summer.  While $43,000 was raised for "fake hate" less than $1,000 was raised for her.

I did not know that such a thing as a "child prostitute" could exist.  I have known some women who did prostitute out their children and I have dealt with some of these exploited children, one of whom, weekly, walked into my daughter's room and utterly destroyed her dolls.

She was about 5 years old when she did this. Each week she would play nice but target one doll and by the end of the day, the doll was shredded to pieces.  The hard plastic faces were targeted the most.

In spite of it, my daughter, a little younger, invited her over again, week by week.  "She doesn't have a daddy" she would remind me.  Her father was dead and her mother was selling her and her sister on the Long Island Rail Road for cigarette money.  Dying of AIDS, she spoke to me without the slightest hint of guilt over her many children.  She repeatedly threatened child protective services of NYC that unless they gave her money money, she would get pregnant again.

She kept that threat at least 7 times before she died.

Those that are immune from the negative consequences often lecture the loudest.

It is like the wealthy who call for no borders and no guns, while living in gated communities, and having armed security as if their lives are worth more than our lives.

A talk show host news program had reported, oddly enough, the explosive issues in the South China Sea in a way that seemed oddly to favor China.  Reuters called the station, got a major run around and eventually learned that...

The Chinese government had purchased the station.

Watching sports on television, I commented this summer my appreciation for professional sports to take the time to honor the military with some pre-game ceremonies.  It seemed to be a "decent thing" to me.

I just learned that they were paid to host military honor events by the Pentagon to do so.

This week, across the nation, the headline read, "Ben Carson Admits Lying!" which, as readers here well know, caught my attention.  I did what many people do, and hit "play" on the audio to hear Dr. Carson's mea culpa.  He had written that he was offered a scholarship by West Point while in high school, but not only was there no proof of this, West Point does not give out scholarships; it is by appointment.  Plus, he has now "admitted" his lie, so I want to post it for analysis.

I have found none, but did find various media outlets calling "Politico" who broke the story only to report that Politico isn't returning phone calls and isn't playing a sound bite, nor actually naming the person to whom Dr. Carson admitted lying, and...

I have two family members who graduated from West Point.  Both were sports stars and before acceptance, when we discussed how in the world it would be afforded, my sister said it was a "full scholarship"  and then went into detail about appointment, grants, etc, and the pattern was typical:

A dedicated high school coach sends out letters to various colleges when there exists outstanding candidates of which schools will send scouts or, in the case of West Point, if the coach knows the student is interested, has the athletic ability and the extremely high grades necessary, contacts WP, who will send a representative who encourages application,  via a non binding offer, the "scholarship", which is later explained in detail where the money comes from.

Carson, going from hot seat to hot seat, did not issue a reliable denial instead opting to say it was a lie and that lying is a moral failure.  A denial that is not reliable doesn't mean deception, unless there is more to it, or the setting and context dictate the clarity, such as a straight forward allegation where one sees the allegation and must say, "I did not steal" or "I did not rape..." and so on.

Sometimes, the allegation is not clear and in interviews, I have given subjects many opportunities to deny it.  Some will say, "Oh, no way I would do that", which is not reliable, only to then say, "I did not do it..." clearly.  Once, in thinking that the subject did not do it, but did not issue a reliable denial, I said, "If you were going to write to the judge on this, what would you write?" to which he said, "but I would not write to the judge!", so I said, "Why not?" and he said, "because I didn't *****"


Politico has now answered the charges of lying and has updated their story and blamed the NY Times.  They use the phrase "per se" appropriately:  exactly the way I understood "scholarship" for family and exactly what a 17 year old kid would understand as well.

"An application to West Point begins with a nomination by a member of Congress or another prominent government or military official. After that, a rigorous vetting process begins. If offered admission, all costs are covered for all students; indeed there are no “full scholarships,” per se."

Over the course of an interview it becomes up to the skill of the analyst to make his conclusion.  A man once was asked if he had killed his son, outside of court.  He said, "I won't even dignify that with an answer!" to which some wrote to me saying, "there it is!  He did it!  He can't deny it!"

The context gave the answer to why the question was sensitive:  He was not a suspect.

Contextually, he was shocked by the question.

I once had a woman repeat my questions back to me.

The questions were sensitive to her.


I asked.

She had major hearing loss.

It is one of the many reasons I encourage formal training of those who are serious about lie detection.

Here, I am alerting some to the understanding that "with knowledge comes much sorrow" in that some people have said that they best enjoy the bliss of ignorance.

In some settings, I agree with them.

Readers here frequently reference main stream or "corporate" media in the negative and I agree:  I do not trust them.

Corporate Media (including Yahoo, BBC, Der Spiegel, NY Times, etc) reported on the Oktoberfest recently.

I have always admired German quality.  My car is German, my shoes are German, and even my dog is all German bloodlines.  I like German Oktoberfest ales, too.

If you read them about Oktoberfest and the migrants you might have come to this portrait in your head:

"Your average German citizen vomits on a public side walk to celebrate Oktoberfest while the poor war weary refugee looks on, pensively, wondering what decadent society she has brought her young chidden to."

In MSM, who are those who do not want Islamic supremacist males, aged 18-30 in their towns?

MSM never fails to use "xenophobic" and "right wing" and the word "Nazi" as well.

If socialism is left wing and capitalism is right wing, why are National Socialists called "far right"?

We look at what happens when someone says, "Uh, I don't think global warming is real" or worse, what happens when a scientist reports it.  The vilification sets in, but think of its source:

The news media.

They are supposed to be reporting the news.

How ironic is "Fox" news' title?

Ever turn it on at, say, 1PM in the afternoon and there are six women in mini-skirts and none of them are unfortunate looking?

What happened to reporting the news?

Then, to show that they are "fair and balanced" they irritate me with shill commentators on both sides.

Why not report the news?

MSNBC's hosting of a presidential debate made our country's media look like a joke.

We saw how bizarre the celebrity status of news reporters (they are reporters, not news "makers") cross over to insane with Brian Williams.

"Newscaster, Brian Williams today, rescued 2, no that is 3 puppies, from a burning fire as the kittens were almost in critical condition, just before boarding a plane to Iraq where he was shot at by ISIS, as bodies were flying across inexpensive coach, where he was able to, single handedly, take control of the massive jet and land it safely in Somalia, just in time to celebrate an Islamic Gay Pride parade after dropping off food in the Sudan."

Glamour Magazine awards "Woman of the Year" to a 65 year old grandfather who killed somebody with his car but dolls up like a college co-ed.

Planned Parenthood butchers sell body parts for really expensive sports cars.

If someone comes to the United States, he cannot be checked to see if he is a wanted murderer, but we will undress an 89 year old woman for a strip search before she enters an airplane.

Our main stream media has not told us the truth on major news stories.

Even when caught, they backpedal and like politicians, they invent new words.

When a politician now says what they believe in, should the public's belief be different, the politician no longer is to be seen as not having a backbone, but

"my position has evolved."

This is supposed to be the new moral high ground.

The problem with this form of evolution is now no politician is ever committed to any single issue.

Those of us who believe voting for someone due to moral character have long been laughed out, but those of us who want to know where a politician stands on a given issue, no longer possess the ability to actually know.

The politician's stance may just "evolve" to something we disagree with.

Monday, November 23, 2015

The Winds of European War

America will undergo a dramatic change post 2016, no matter who is elected.

The FBI will restore the word "Islam" to its terrorism manuals, and there will be a reduction in Muslim Brotherhood appointments; quiet and small reduction under Hilary, but major and perhaps, complete, reduction under Trump.

Under Trump or perhaps others, the Islamic invasion of America via migration, will slow, and we will have to deal in areas where Dhimmitude has been expressed through political correctness and submission.

But for Europe, it is too late. 

Even if Germany, for example, were to completely stop its importing of Muslims yesterday, the population is enough today to threaten violence to gain major concessions, (historically) but then we must add in Family Reunification programs (add 6 million more, immediately, to the population) but we still must deal with the

"women and children refugees" that did not show up, though were reported by the BBC.

The immigrants were 80% or more young male.  There are approximately 5 million Muslim male 18 year olds today, and approximately 5 million German male 18 year olds today in Germany.

The German population is not even replenishing itself, while the Muslim population is exploding.

The number of German soldiers and Muslim soldiers is equal.  This will change dramatically in 18 years to the number of Muslim soldiers greatly outnumbering the German soldiers.

We will not wait 18 years for the results.

When did World War II begin?

This is an important question.

Shortly after the Treaty of Versaille was signed, trouble brewed.  When the stock market crashed and began its spread of crisis of confidence around the world in 1929, Germany was already in trouble.

The complaints grew louder and louder over the next decade until war in 1939.

War takes time to percolate.

Objection:  War came suddenly to America, not over many years.

Answer:  Hardly.

FDR did everything to pick a fight with Japan possible and finally succeeded in his embargo.  The set up of our fleet bottled up in the harbor has long been discussed but FDR's language revealed deception as he tried to "persuasively promise" to keep us out.  It was the language of deception.  He wanted us in.

Winston Churchill wanted us in, but was not deceptive about it.

We look now and see Europe crumbling under Dhimmitude growing, and Muslim growth and wonder, "this is why our grandfathers died?  To save freedom only to watch freedom suffocate voluntarily bowing before Islam?"

War is coming.

In my article on the Third European World War, I outlined how it might develop, but development is on the way.

I speculated on which country might be the first to cede sovereign property to Islamic supremacists for the sake of peace, with special attention on Sweden, or Merkel's Germany, as the claim for Israel is loud to give up property to its sworn enemy.  But I did not consider Belgium!

Belgium already has a city that produces the most jihadists per capita, which we do not need a map to remind us that Belgium is in Europe, not the Middle East.

France has its own Muslim run cities and as recently pointed out in Germany:  Germany doesn't seem to fear ISIS attacks.

Germany is Islam friendly, dhimmitude submissive, and has soaring Islamic crime, including rapes, as well as Islamic clans running Berlin, but it is not a target for Islamic terror.  This is due to the lengthy friendly relationship between Germany and Islam.

Using history as our guide, let's consider:

1.  Growing Muslim complaints of "Islamophobia"
2.  Growing Muslim violence, like Paris.  The corporate or MSM hides all the "small" reports; the rape epidemic and the governments try to adjust the statistics.  The violence is everywhere.
3.  The displacement of the European.
4.  The resentment of being blamed.
5.  The backlash that must come naturally.

When the moment of silence is disrupted by thousands of cheers of "Allahu Akbar" at a soccer/football match, it is not by Islamic extremest. The extremest do not attend football games. 

I saw the video of the New Jersey Muslims celebrating in the streets of Jersey and saw how quickly CNN dropped the story and stopped airing the video.  I stood on top of a bridge, watching the smoke from the Trade Centers while on Long Island, with my children, wondering, "why do they hate us so much?  What have we done?"

Thus began my learning of Islamic teaching and why Jonathan Edwards called it "the antichrist of the East" and why Churchill warned against it like rabies overtaking a dog.

Islamic supremacy is a contagion that spreads slowly but incessantly.

What I think is to happen:

When 129 people are killed, the headlines blare.

Barak Obama has confessed his Muslim belief, via pronoun as "we Muslims must...", so he sees this as a victory and it explains why his response was to say "I will import more Muslims from Syria" as he has one year left to complete his "change" of America.  This is predictable.

John Kerry and the extremest left say "Global Warming" caused it, while Sweden says, "Israel caused it", while others say "loss of jobs caused it" and on and on it goes...

while the average person grows in anger.

The BBC broadcasted that women and children were fleeing war in Syria as "war refugees", over and over, while citizens posted videos showing the contrary:  young men, eager for jizrah from Sweden and German, were angrily invading Europe.

When the videos from citizens flooded the world with the truth, the BBC continues the propaganda.

When a European speaks the truth, he or she is pummeled into submission, yet the public still sees it.

When Merkel demands the "far right Nazi xenophobes islamophobes" stay home at a rally expecting 5,000, 10,000 show up instead.

When citizens see Christmas being cancelled so as not to upset Muslims, they are angry.

Yet, this is not enough to cause war.

Follow the money.

Millions of Islamic supremacists have invaded Europe and they have a violent, sexually misogynistic violent, ideology of supremacy with them.

They do not assimilate and they do not, in large majority, work.

Europe has always yawned at warnings against socialism, with wealth making the warnings of Winston Churchill look like nothing.

But it is the warning of another Brit that should be heard:

"When their nests become well feathered..." warned Charles Spurgeon, they forget the source of their blessings and their ego takes over.

In a recent pithy American Thinker article, the author showed wealthy Germans utterly disinterested in discussing Islamic invasion thinking, "if they rub shoulders with us long enough, they will love working at Mercedes Benz so much more so than blowing up buildings to justify the Koran's description of kaffir culture."

They also think that the 2nd generation would assimilate.

Denmark statistics tell us:  the 2nd generation works even less than the first and actually increased in crime!

In other words, what they believe, they do. Or, "it's the ideology, stupid!"

The natural tension will continue to grow and once Russia has annihilated the budding caliphate in Syria, ISIS will not be ISIS, nor Al Quada, but some other form of Islam and will focus on its strongholds in Belgium, France, Sweden, Denmark, England, and in Germany and will take the fight to the locals.

The political pressure will increase.

The infiltration of schools will increase.

The rape epidemic will also increase.

The dhimmitude stance of politicians will increase.  (Hey, who wants a riot on their term?  They want their own school holiday?  Its better than riots!  Just given in!)

The displacement will continue with "white flight" and "brain flight" and actual government confiscation of property as we have already seen.

But it will be the violence that'll eventually lead to the armed local conflicts, which may begin as "skirmishes" minimized by the BBC and other state-sponsored media.

George Soros, master of manipulating currency, will benefit financially, but the European utopia will being to feel like Greece on steroids.

The inevitable cut backs of welfare benefits will be hailed as Islamophobic racist hateful attempts to disenfranchise a victimized population even more!

Enter Iran and Saudi Arabia's money.

The gun smuggling versus gun restriction in Europe already means that Europeans cannot defend their families.

The broke welfare system will raid Europeans' state retirements to stop the Muslim complaints.  This, coupled with the incessant Paris like attacks, and all the embitteredness of feeling like a stranger in their own homes and...

An uprising or insurrection will occur and here will be the breaking point of no return:

Merkel or a Merkel like faithful dhimmitude will order the military in to squash the "rebellion."

It may be successful but not forever, as history will be heard:

The first time a military commander lands his troops to crush the rebellion of the "xenophobic right wing nazi citizens" and turns and defends the citizens instead, defying the government, the war that appeared only small and guerrilla warfare like, is now on.


If it takes a decade or more for dissatisfaction to brew, we are already years in.
If it takes lots of deaths to finally stop the PC lies, we are closer than we were last month.
If it takes a financial crisis to fuel dissatisfaction and awaken the slumbering prideful, we are close.

I know that many commentators have predicted the war will begin in Germany in the next generation when the Muslim outnumbers the German.  I disagree and here is why:

The money.

The Islamic supremacist sees working for the European as contrary to the Koran's teaching of his own supremacy.  This is why they spit out food, demand more, get more, but are forever dissatisfied.  It is the nature of supremacy itself:  even in 100% Islamic nations, they fight one against another.  What we prize as self control, they see as weakness.  What we see as childish weakness, they see as righteousness.  What we see as rape, they see as Allah's reward.  What we see as beauty in arts, they see as a waste of time to be blown up.

The money.

There is no way Europe, even with more and more taxes, can support the Muslim on welfare.  There are just too many, too many multiple wives, too many Muslim children in state foster homes, and too many in special education.

Plus, the lowering of school standards is very late.  The school standards have been dropping due to the Muslim element in the classroom: the inability of close marriage products, to keep up, the constant protests and disruptions, and the violence have all already lowered standards.

By actually dropping grade requirements, Germany, for example, is just stamping its approval on what the last 30 years of multiculturalism has brought her.  Standards have been down for decades; they are only just formally announcing it.

The brilliance of German manufacturing will be over soon.

The BBC tells us that not only is it all women and children, but they all have advanced degrees.

The IQ tests tell us that they are borderline mentally retarded or, in the very least, uneducated, untrained entry level laborers only.

They cannot, wholesale, be trained for Mercedes Benz.

The money.

Money is always somewhere in the mix for war and not only will Europe be incapable of maintaining socialism, but welfare states and open borders do not work and only hasten the pride of socialism.

Europe grew very wealthy from its Christian roots.

Even the smart mouthed comedian Pat Condell who decries Islam benefits from being born next to neighbors who's culture has been "thou shalt not kill" and "do unto others", whether he wishes to believe it or not.  He is a smart man, but he has his own religion, too, yet fears to label it as such.
We all have our religion.  We may discover it as we go to the final source or arbitration of right from wrong for us.

Pat is right about Islam and he is right about Islamic rape, Islamic crime and how homosexuals will one day long for the time where they were told "thou shalt not" by Christians, rather than being stoned or thrown off buildings by Islamic supremacists.

Christians hold to the Bible, and the basic freedoms and dignity of man taught in the Bible led to the beautification of Europe, and, as many say, Luther and Calvin founded America.

Christians see the Bible as the final arbitrator of right from wrong.

When society dictates the final arbitration of right from wrong, we do not need to travel back in time to Nazi Germany to expose the fallacy of this, but shoot over to the United Nations Human Rights Counsel in Saudi Arabia, the "beheading capital of the world" to see what "community standards" really means to a community.

Europe got its wealth from the Judeo-Christian ethic and it produced freedom, human rights, art, and rebirth, howbeit, with plenty of struggles, set backs, and reformation moving forward.

Yet she got so wealthy that she felt god like power, with unlimited wealth and all the barbarism of the Third World needed was to bask in the presence of the haughty European.

In Paris, they have flowers, while the Islamics are simply reloading for their next attack.

In Sweden, they have eunuchs, who can only watch in horror as their women and children are raped.  They open another rape center, as the rapes have now spread to males, but they are incapable of defending women and children with the men tyrannized under feminism which meant substitution of patriarchal Christianity for "egalitarianism" which attempted to masquerade matriarchal society.  Now they ridicule the "feelings first" responses of Sweden and Germany with various names and jokes, but the bloodshed continues.

France, hailed for its un-obama like reaction to ISIS, will be also increasing its Islamic migration.

War is in the air.

The propaganda and demonization of those who want freedom is not working as more and more Europeans are awakening to the death toll, and the closing down of their own cities.

Snopes ridiculed "no go zones" while European police knew exactly how many hundreds of them existed.  Fox News apologized, even as these numbers classified by police grew.

Islam cannot be reformed.

The Christian reformation was a "turning back" to the Bible, and the great "Solas" of the reformation including "Sola Scriptura" which meant strictly limiting the various governments of:

the family
the church
the civil magistrate

so that freedoms would be maintained.

A law would be thus scrutinized under the light of Scripture and all ideologies weighted against it.  This is why communism and socialism were rejected.  Since the 70's, Europe seemed to disprove the points of freedom as it became the socialist utopia of the world, but all false "peace" will come to an end and human nature will prevail.

It went in waves of progression.

The barbarian killed the unarmed gentleman.

Next generation:

The gentleman insisted on inviting the barbarian into his home.

The barbarian killed the gentleman and took his home.

The next gentleman insisted on paying the barbarian to enter his home.

The barbarian took his money, his wife and his daughter, and killed the gentleman just the same.

Because bloodlust is insatiable, even the killing of those whom the barbarian lives off matters not.

One single week before 9/11, companies were offering college kids $2500 checks to come work for them.

On 9/12, all offers were rescinded.

Violence is not loaded with wisdom.

War is in the air.

The winds of war blow for quite some time but inevitably, war makes it way.

Sadly, it is either war or Dhimmitude's slavery status.

Saturday, November 21, 2015

The Slumber of America

Recently, we heard that 40% of young people feel that 'offensive speech' should be limited by government.  

This is shocking. 

Protestant Christianity, in its migration to the United States (before the formation of the US) brought this absolute element of freedom of speech, specifying it to:  'treasonous language against the government.'

The entire point of 'offensive speech' is that it is offensive to someone:  in general, the powers that be.  

Today, if you disagree with government, your argument will not be heard. 

We see this even with governors of States refusing to accept Syrian migrants due to the supremacy teaching of Islam and the violence that it calls for.  

Obama's reaction?

Not simply resistance, but to increase the number of imported Islamic supremacists.  

"John Calvin and Martin Luther were the founders of America" is what people say, in the sense that their teaching, including on the 'divine right of kings' being challenged if the king would usurp his role under Christ.  The king, himself, was subject to the Scripture.  If the king is the final rule, he is above criticism.  If the government is the final arbitrator of right from wrong, it is above criticism. 

If you criticize the government today, you are unworthy of having your argument heard:

"you are hateful" and you have "irrational fear", such as:

Here is my migration policy and you disagree, therefore, you shall not have your opinion heard because you are "immorally full of hatred for your common man" and you have  "xenophobia", that is, an irrational fear of foreigners.  (Islamophobia is something many of us say is something we are labeled when we understand the Koran).  

America is moving towards the European model of making speech a crime.  This began with politicians seeking a faux moral high ground with "hate crimes", which eventually did catch on.  This meant that if Person A murdered Person B he would receive punishment but if he said something to Person B before killing him, the punishment should be worse. 

Instead of simply stating that Person A has forfeiting his right to live because he took Person B's life, the government is now the great "reader of the heart" which, when accepted by the slumbering American people, has led to today's "reading of the heart" and "discerning both hate and phobia" in those who disagree with government. 

It is no wonder that American young people are not being taught history today as it has been commonly been taught, in favor of new "white shaming" and "white privilege" which has ignited the anger of the masses in racial hatred. 

The great homosexual rights movement will leave the homosexual pining for the day when he was told "repent and believe in Christ", which he found so offensive, yet under Islam, he is beaten, stoned and thrown off buildings.  Under Christianity, he was free to reject the offer of Christians.  Under Islam, "peace" comes from "submission"; with the "peace" coming from their death.  

This "change" was brought, in earnest by Barak Hussein Obama's rampant racism and his Islamic faith which means:

In corporate media, if you want access to the White House, you better toe the line on free speech, and if you want high positions across the nation, you must also agree with the new assault on free speech, thus the screaming midnight call throughout our colleges and the newfound resentment of the white Christian race. 

The 3rd world has not missed this.  

They saw what impact Christianity had upon America and Europe, and the prosperity and has done everything it could to join in to the prosperity, first, seeking proudly to be called "American" and now to take what they can from America, while condemning America.  

Europe prospered from its Christian heritage of "do unto others" and "thou shalt not", producing a magnificent culture the envy of the world and now it denies the very thing that got them there, and have openly invited Islamic supremacists who, since the 1970's have shown them:

We will not assimilate.  

We are your superior and will continue to live off of you (the jizya)  

We will outbreed you.  

In Germany, Mama Merkel has, like Obama, dug in her heels and instead of owning error, has increased migration and her country's take over.  We will likely learn that the predicted 1.5 million will end up over 6 million, quickly, with families, and as the Islamists have said, they will have 4 wives, 18 children, and soon overtake Germany. 

Here is the sad reality:  

If Germany were to close her borders today, completely, the birthrate would still mean her demise in a single generation.  If within 3 and 1/2 years, Germany has 20 million Islamists, the 20% mark, given the violent and incessant dissatisfaction of Islam, will mean Dhimmhtude for Germany.  

The Paris mentality that says, "son, they have guns, but we have flowers" is the antithesis of the Biblical mandate to pray and fight.  The "sword and the trowel" were used to build the wall of protection and "loving one's neighbor" meant to fight, but to practice ethical warfare, including giving quarter to prisoners of war, but it does not preclude fighting, and the prayer to "teach my hands the skills of war..."

As Europe holds out the flower to the Islamist, the Islamist responds with the AK 47, having no issue importing it in spite of strict gun laws. 

What is Europe's response?

Limit its citizens from hand guns. 

This "flower" ideology is being imported by Obama, not because he is unintelligent, on the contrary, he is acting according to his belief in Islamic supremacy and his hatred of white and black Christians.  (Is there any better explanation as to why he can look at a black city with high unemployment and still break down the borders to supply businesses with labor?)

As we see Europe slumber before the Great Islamic Migration of the 2000's, we see American leadership's success in bringing the same slumber to American colleges. 

While Islam trains soldiers, American college kids hail a 65 year old grandfather as its "woman of the year."

While Europe proudly boasts of her wealth, she imports the Islamic supremacist thinking that by just basing in her glory, the Islamic will overthrow 1400 years of brutality in brainwashing and in-breeding. 

Her nest, well feathered, has brought her ease and her ease has brought her slumber. 

While she slept, her foundlings were torn from her nest.  

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Soccer Match: The Moderate Muslim

In the soccer match where thousands can be heard first boo'ing  the moment of silence for Paris, and then chanting "Allah Akbar" in unison, we note who the multitude was:

Moderate Muslims.

Radicals do not attend soccer matches, nor musical concerts, poetry readings or other acts of culture.  It is forbidden to them.  Only moderate or secular muslims attend.

The depth of sound heard in the stadium tells the public what most of us know:

Moderate Muslims are those who do not commit the violence but have the same supremacist ideology of the supremacist jihadists.

They choose among them the weak, the feeble, the dissatisfied, the most depressed, mentally ill, and those who feel unworthy or unnoticed within their society for suicide bombings.  When they attend Mosque, the imam does his own vetting; who is low intelligence, low paid, unemployed, disaffected and "radicalize" him; that is, bring him to a level of devout obedience to the Koran, and make him, known by none, to be a "star" within his community and bring him the recognition he has craved for all his young life.

They know how to exploit their own.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Barak Obama's Confession

Initially, when campaigning, Sen. Barak Obama downplayed his Muslim roots and sympathies.  

Since that time, he has become more outspoken for Islam, including short clips in which he indicates his Muslim roots, including paving the way for Iran to hasten its development of nuclear weapons    

In Statement Analysis, we have a principle known as "confession by pronoun."

It is a powerful tool which gets to the truth.  

1.  Every person has an internal, subjective personal dictionary.  

A person of average intelligence has an internal dictionary of about 25,000 words.  While speaking freely, the person will choose which of these words to use, where to place each word, and what verb tenses to use.  This speed of transmission takes place in less than a micro second.  When a person is deceptive, there is a slight disruption in this process, which causes internal stress,  picked up in the polygraph examination. 

At any time, a person is subject to interpretation.  In Statement Analysis, we do not interpret, we listen.  As an example, in law enforcement seminars, I ask detectives, 

"What do you think of when I say the word, "boy"?

Inevitably answers will have a range of up to 21 years: 

a.  One imagines a newborn male child
b.  Another thinks of a  7 year old Little Leaguer. 
c.  Still another thinks of his  21 year old son, soldier.  

Therefore, when the word "boy" is used, we allow the subject to interpret for us if the context does not. This allows for accuracy in our interviewing.  

2.  There are three exemptions to this principle: 

Time, articles and pronouns. 

Objective time on a clock:  if it is 10 minutes past Noon, it is 12:10PM for everyone.  

Articles:  "the, a and an" are instinctive.  "I saw a man carrying a gun.  The man told me to give him my money..."  If the articles are confused, deception is indicated:  "I saw the man with the gun and he said to me to give him the cash" is an indication of a scam as the word "a" is used to introduce and the word "the" comes after the introduction.

3.  Pronouns

Pronouns are so powerful that they get their own lessons in Statement Analysis.  

Pronouns are instinctive and can even pre-date speech as a child says "my", with hand gestures (often, opening and closing) and pronouns require no pre thought.  When someone is alone, he will not say "we"; when someone owns something, he will say "my" and so on.  

Example #1:   Rape

"We drove to the woods and he raped me.  Then, we drove here, I jumped out and called police."  

The word "we" indicates unity and cooperation.  In rape statements, the word "we" will not enter the language of a victim of a rape after the assault.  In every rape case I have been involved in, or others have in which this was indicated, the claim proved to be  false.  Confronting the alleged victim with this produced confession, including the above, "My father wouldn't allow me to go out with him and I was scared, so I..."

In analyzing some of the statements of Bill Cosby's accusers, I noted that once the assault took place, the word "we" disappeared from the language, indicating a change in the relationship between the writer and Cosby had taken place. 

When Bill Clinton was first running for office, Hilary was campaigning for him when the first "bimbo eruption" hit the news.  Hilary said,

"When the man I love, and the man respect is attacked, you bet I am going to speak out."

Years and countless accusations later, the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke.  Hilary again came to his defense:

"When the man you respect and the man you love is accused..."

Not only did she intuitively reverse "love" and "respect" but the  years of constant infidelity and humiliation ejected the pronoun "I" from her language.  

I was asked to work on a campaign to free convicted killer Dennis Dechaine, convicted of murdering 12 year old Sarah Cherry in the woods of Maine.  I agreed to analyze the transcripts where Dechaine spoke on his own behalf.  

He claimed to have never met the victim and that he was alone in the woods, lost.  

"I was standing admiring the deciduous trees when we were losing daylight, so I..."

I told his private investigator that he lied about being alone in the woods, and the jury got it right.  We also note here the body posture of "standing" (the victim would have been tied up, lying on the ground, according to the evidence) with body posture often an indication of an increase in tension at this point of the statement. 

Compare the two:

"My supervisor said for me to be at work on time."

"My supervisor stood and told me to be at work on time."

Not only does the second sentence change "said" to "told", which is more authoritative and 'one way', but he included the supervisor's body posture of "stood", in the language.  This is a decision in the brain to choose this word in less than a microsecond of time, which gives us great accuracy in analysis.  Deception interrupts this process. 

The pronoun "my" is something that we use millions of times, and for many, it predates speech.  We take ownership only of what we want or own. 

OJ Simpson said, "for those of you who believe in my guilt..."

In a $600,000 heist, police were baffled and although most of the money was recovered, it was kept in evidence, much to the chagrin of the company, who asked for my help.  I reviewed the police file, especially the statement of the employee who had been beaten and forced to give up the combination to the safe:

"They beat me over the head and were screaming at me to give them the combination to the safe.  Then we went into the warehouse where I was forced to give them..."

I said, "Your employee is in on it.  There is no way after a beating that the victim is going to use the word "we" to connect himself to the assailants.  He is part of the gang."

The employee was arrested and the money released.  

In Statement Analysis, confession by pronoun is common.  One study suggests that up to 70% of closed cold case files have "confession by pronoun" in the transcripts.  

When speaking at a presser on November 15th, after the Paris Islamic attack, Barak Hussein Obama said "on the one hand, non Muslims cannot stereotype but I also think the Muslim community has to think about how we make sure that children are not being infected with this infected notion that somehow they can kill innocent people and that that is justified by religion. "

As humans, we act upon what we believe.  Terrorists believe the Koranic calls for coercive conquest and act upon them, and Barak Obama acts upon what he believes. 

There is no inconsistency here.