Wednesday, November 11, 2015

The Coming BackLash: Ceding European Land To Islam

Poland, 1939

The politicians in Europe do not represent the majority of Europeans.  Yes, they elected them, but America elected Barak Obama and most people that I have spoken to or corresponded with who did vote for him did not ever believe he would turn so radical and anti-American, pro Islam anarchist.  Even in listening to his speeches from 2007, it sounded like silly political-speak and no one predicted the tyranny of "executive orders" and the abandonment of the rule of law.  They have seen their country ripped in two, and the racist and anti police rhetoric take its toll.

The majority of Europeans did initially believe in multiculturalism, an "ism" that believes that a multitude of cultures is superior to their own culture.  This deliberately removes from all arguments:

1.  The difference in cultures
2.  Ideological Conflicts
3.  Biology including immunity development, and IQ
4.  Financial Cost
5. Long Term Repercussions

Anyone who disagrees with the political elite is told that their opinion is of no value because:

a.  Their personal character is one of murderous emotion:  hate, nazi, right wing, nationalism
b.  Their mental health is disturbed by irrational fear:  "islamophobia, xenophobia

Therefore, they are bullied into silence.  Human beings have been created to communicate.  It is something they must do and when, in history, it is taken from them, the result has always been the same:  backlash.  Deadly backlash. 

Currently:  The politicians in Europe have made two particular claims:

1.  We must not have borders
2.  We must not have guns

They make this claim while:

1.  Living behind a protective border
2.  Armed protection

If a citizen disagrees with the politician, the citizen is condemned and silenced with the claim of "hatred" and "irrational fears."  In opening their borders, they have:

a.  Invited in and forced citizens to pay for an ideology many times worse than Nazism.  Islam has a history of backing up its claim of violent coercion and conquest.

b.  They have gone against the will of their people
c.  They have endangered their own people
d.  They have destroyed lives of their own people.  A single Islamic rape victim is not just a life that is ruined, but everyone who loves her also suffers and is filled with rage.

By silencing and tyrannizing their own people, including by the invocation of the name, "Hitler" in this silencing, they have actually set the stage for "Hitler" to return.  The "Hitler 2.0" is going to remind European men that they are still men playing upon the horrible insult Angela Merkel dished out to German men when she asked for Muslim men to come and repopulate Germany.

How did German men abide this insult?

They now hear it in taunts by imams around the world.  How did German men remain silent?  How did even male supporters of Merkel not explode in anger over this terrible insult?


Has Germany neutered its male population in the name of "egalitarianism"?

As the European government has even outlawed criticism of itself, further "silencing" people who feel the absolute need to be heard.

Historically, governments that have silenced criticism and have exploited people for their own gain (immigration  builds a one party system in America, therefore illegal immigrants, including the flooding from prisons, vote for the one who suspended all laws and gives them free money) eventually will push their people to the point where they move in transitions:

Support of the government;
Questioning of the government;
Mild disapproval of the government
Criticism of the government frowned upon;
Criticism of the government disapproved;
Criticism of the government condemned (xenophobe, hateful nazi bringing citizens to the point of being insulted by their own government which has strong emotional impact;
Criticism of the government outlawed.

Tyranny began with just shout downs but moved to insults, taunts, and finally, condemnation of dissidents as immoral and mentally unstable, utterly unworthy of being a citizen and having a voice and now:

The opposition to the government is filled with resolve.

This resolve grows when government's influence overshadows journalistic integrity.

Jizya

Sweden's government pays its media.
Angela Merkel's corporate media conspires with her to hide the truth, from the numbers of migrant invaders ("800,000" quickly went to an admission after being caught, to 1.5 million, more than a month ago, yet main stream media continues to report the initial lie of 800K as the number for 2015).

Europe demanded that Greece face austerity and when the EU and Greece went into a stare down, Greece blinked.

Now, this same EU, as run by Germany, is demanding endless money, in a most Messianic like manner, "for all of them!", that is, people of various races, nations and cultures who all have one thing in common:  an ideology of supremacy.

German citizens have been told not only that they have no choice but to accept Islam, but they must pay for the Islamic invaders and behave like dhimmi, and that if they disagree, they are hateful, mentally unstable, and not worth of citizenship, and can have their properties seized and their lives endangered.  Their wives and daughters can be raped (sound familiar to the hated "Quartering Act" to US ears?) and it will be the females' fault for not dressing the way the Islamic supremacists demanded.

This is going to end in war.

More and more Germans are being called "Nazi" with less and less of them caring.

The German government position is so weak that it must be enforced against the will of their own people.   They must be condemned, and ostracized for disagreeing with the government.

Sound familiar to the German ears?

This is what happened in the 1930's by the very party who's name Angela Merkel so often invokes.

In the 1930's, Germany was tyrannized by, not the Jew, but the European who was extracting "war reparations" via the Treaty of Versaille, and pummeling the German name and reputation so terribly, that it gave birth to Adolph Hitler.

Hitler began as a resistance to the dreaded treaty, wrongfully assigning its venom to Jews, but the fight was already picked.

Germany was forced to pay more than it could, so it printed money.

Now, Germany, who strong armed the Greeks who wanted to retire very young, is strong arming all of Europe for a people who view work as punishment.  Their own ideology holds to the non Islamic paying them to live.

This is called "Jizya" by Islamists.

This is called "welfare" by Europeans.


It is one and the same in application.


Germany and Sweden are the destinations for the migrants because they offer them the most money.  The thousands and thousands of "unaccompanied children" are found to be, quite remarkably, all about "16 years of age."

These are males, 18-28, who "lost" their birth certificate and pose as 16 year old "children", in order to not only claim more welfare, but to commit supremacist Islamic rape of "kaffir" uncovered "whores" (European women) knowing that as "children", the risk of being prosecuted is much less.

As they continue to impose things they do not like, and do not listen, eventually more people will see the government as the enemy.

Peoples, anywhere and of every time, place and type, can only be pushed so far.

When people take the law in to their own hands, you get krystalnacht.  In Sweden, Krystalnacht commemoration turned into celebration by not invited Jews.

Europe is moving towards War.  This War will be a "killing war" and it will use all weapons at their disposal.

Limited wars are limited due to self interest:  people who treasure life and do not treasure death.

The ideology of Islam is sexual violence leading to death which is then rewarded by more sexual violence in the deflowering of 70 virgins.

This is one twisted, sick perverted ideology, but we must remember that today, yesterday, tomorrow, and all of history teaches:

We do that which we believe.

As more and more Germans are called "nazis" and are told that they are irrational, mentally ill, and unfit to be citizens, the galvanization will continue.

The politicians in Germany fill their own people with resolve by fueling them with taunts, insults, but worse than anything:

Silence.

Victims cannot remain silent forever.

In my work, I get more confessions and admissions in interviews than most others as I use specific, logical, legal, non intrusive interviewing in which the subject's own words are employed.  People have a very tough time lying about their own lies, to the point that they would rather confess than to look upon their deceptive words and lie about them.  Even the guilty cannot be silent:  they must talk about what they have done and I do most of the listening, and little of the talking.

We all have a desire to communicate that is given to us in creation, itself.

Guilty people must talk about what they have done.

Multiply this many times over and learn:

Victims must have a voice.  They go insane, literally, from not processing the trauma they experienced at the hands of the violent.  This is what relieves the 'pressure' on the brain:  the processing of the information through talking and journaling, with research suggesting that journaling is even more effective.

The small towns that are now overrun with non Germans who believe themselves superior to the point of walking into a store and stealing what they want, is only affirmed to the supremacists when young, foolish naive German citizens run to offer food, clothing and even themselves, to the migrants.  The migrants sing songs of jihad against their German hosts while the German college kids applaud.

Others twist Christianity to enforce their own suicide upon their nation, even as the supremacists burn the food, and demand money, with the money never being enough.  Hence, the nature of supremacist thinking:  nothing is ever satisfactory and violence is always the result.

Germany is ripe for a strong, masculine figure who will offer the German citizens protection from the politicians who have looted and endangered Germany.

He may start out with a posture of self defense and win the hearts of many, but the risk is always the same:

power corrupts.

The founders of the most successful nation in the world severely limited government because tyranny can come through 1 leader, or an entire Senate of leaders, because it is not the number, but the authority.

Limit government severely and let freedom bring about natural consequence and personal responsibility.

The government is an opinion with a gun.

Socialism is a government with opinions on everything in life, rather than a limited government which is designed to punish crime, and raise a military for self defense.

It may seem utterly harmless to have government dictate what size soda you have, but the end is alway the same:

Government is never satisfied once she is given more power.

In France, even if you statistically prove that obedience to the Koran leads to rape of French women, you face prison.

In Sweden, you cannot even criticize your government's policy on immigration as they implement Sharia blasphemy laws.

In the UK, thousands of little girls were raped, with many blamed, while few rapists were arrested, because the government feared being called "racist."

It is not just those lives that are destroyed, but everyone who loves them is harmed and now, with the passage of time, those victims have gone on to have children of their own, who have been abused, taken into custody, while victims have gone on to drugs, promiscuity, homelessness and suicide.

All across Germany, rapes, looting, and violence is broken out, with media's complicit silence "lest immigration opponents be strengthened", therefore, to protect a policy, German citizens will go unwarned.

Berlin is said to now be ruled by at least 12 Islamic tribal crime "families" ruling the underground.

Thousand of "no go zones" exists where Sharia rules and citizens fear to enter in, and police presence is limited or non existent.

War is coming.

Eventually, Sweden or Germany will make a last ditch desperate attempt to avoid war and this will also have historic precedence:

Appeasement.

Germany and Sweden have appeased Islamic supremacist ideology for decades, but more in the last year than ever before.

Angela Merkel demands that the tiny nation of Israel cede over a portion of its land to Islamic supremacists who use violence to enforce their demands.

She is going to do the same.

Perhaps it will be Austria as the victim, but somewhere, at some point, Germany who has already likely considered this, will cede off some portion of its territory to form a European Islamic State on its territory.

It won't be in Hungary without a fight, as Merkel has threatened her neighbors.

Who will be "the Poles" of Europe, the people who are sacrificed to keep peace by appeasement?

It will not be empty, vacant land, either.  This would never be accepted by the Islamic supremacists.

NOTE:  it must be land that contains sufficient dhimmi to work for the supremacists in order to accommodate the welfare addicted Islamic immigrants and it cannot be a full de-funding from Europe.

How might we predict where this will first take place?

Malmo?



We should consider lands where the percentages help us understand.  For example, in a small town where there are 100 citizens who now are out-numbered 8:1, are helpless and no amount of pepper spray will keep them safe.  They will convert to Islam, accept dhimmitude, or move out, even to the point of abandoning their property or selling off at "Jew discounts"; that is, 1/10th the value, as was the case of Jewish owned lands and businesses who were force to sell to get something before outright confiscation took place at the hands of the Nazi.

We must ask:

Where is Merkel putting the most Islamists per capita?

What portion of Germany does she have in mind, about a Caliphate, de facto, set up?

Where would the "vote" be at its least volume?

Who will be Merkel's "Poland" to be handed over, in appeasement, to the European Islamic State, just as Europe allowed Germany and the Soviet Union to divide up Poland in two?

This ceding of land will postpone war, but only for a short time, as it will enrage the German people.  I do not think that Sweden has enough masculinity left within its culture to fight.  Swedish nationals have been brought up in self loathing, almost apologizing for being men.  Perhaps the bill from WWII's profiting has come due.  I hope not, but I believe they do not possess the moral courage in this generation to fight.  They have emasculated their country, and have emasculated their churches.  "Feelings" overrule truth, and it seems that is eradicated every spot of masculinity from each and every aspect of society.  They will likely need to be brought to a place where they actually need men fighting for them, before they value men again.  This is a terrible reality but when a military argues over which man wearing which dress is to be promoted, and how they will prosecute soldiers who insult the enemy before killing, and how equal rights for women means fudging military injury and rape statistics, instead of celebrating strength, it does not bring military success.


I know that this echoes the military under Obama, too.

Yet, I think it is Germany, under the emotional and irrational leadership of Merkel that will find itself in this 'just pre-war' crisis and she will do what she has shown to do when she is wrong:  dig in her heels and compound her mistakes, instead of owning and abandoning them.

Shotguns are now running 4-6 weeks in backorder for Germans, as they are permitted, still, to own them.  This, too, will come to an end soon.  When Dr. Carson said that Jews in Germany could have fared better had they been armed, something this obvious was met with "hate and phobia" by those who demand no guns nor protective fences be built:  those who have gated armed security for themselves, the politicians.

Much heartache has come to Germany already, with few voices being heard.  If not for the internet, the world would not know the daily reports of rape.  If not for citizens and cell phones, we would only see the photos of "women and children" by main stream media, and not the massive overwhelming number of fit, strong, well fed, 21 year old males.  Even as the United Nations now admits "70% are young males", locals report, "No, it is the same minimization and deception:  it is more than 90%" as well as reports of home invasion, violent theft, and intimidation that the media will not report.

The BBC gives a snapshot while the citizen gives us the video.

The BBC shows a child being saved by migrants, but the video shows the same child being used as a human shield against police.

The world press saw a photo of bullying European police beating a man, his wife and child, on the railroad tracks, and groaned under "white privilege" guilt.  It was "the Crusades all over again", or "they are marking the refugees like nazi tattoos", while citizens gave us videos that showed:

The man threw his wife and child down on to the tracks while the police sought to pull him off of them, and...

the pens were used for identification to help the processing system that has gone mad.

We have moved past the stage where trust is broken with both government and main stream media and have arrived at anger, betrayal, and resolve.

Breaking news:  New York Times discovers Ben Carson returned a video in the early 90's without rewinding it.

When a Czech medical professional wrote what she experienced in a German hospital "Snopes" called it "unverified" officially, but its article used "analysis" to show how it was not real.


They did not use Statement Analysis, nor any identified form of analysis for its conclusion and the very same points they made to discredit the letter were the very same indicators of veracity used in Statement Analysis to show:  The writer wrote from experiential memory.

When Germany admits that it is now "1.5 million for 2015", what is the real number?

When it "admits" that there are "about 4 relatives per refugee to follow", what is the real number?

When Sweden refuses to acknowledge second generation Middle East North Africa rapists as anything but "Swedish", and the statistics are still epidemic, what must the real numbers mean, and what is daily life like for the average Swedish family living near Islamic supremacists from the middle east and northern Africa?

The Europeans are about ready to come apart at the seams from being silenced.  Since Germany and Sweden's politicians have been so resolved to ignore history, it is history, itself, about to make its sudden, dramatic, yet full warned, appearance.

I know that there are Swedish men who are still men, but they, themselves know how few of them exist.  It takes a civilization trauma to reawaken its manhood.  This is the sad historical reality.  It is great to have egalitarianism with firemen and fire fighters until lives are lost because the female was incapable of lifting heavy people out of the fire, then common sense returns, but is quickly condemned as "hate" and "phobia", once again.  I feel terrible when I read of the Northern Europeans decrying loss of masculinity, which is only further insulted by Merkel's call to the Muslim man to come and populate their lands.

The insult runs deep within men.

What part of Europe do you think will be the first to go in appeasement to Islamic demands?

6 comments:

  1. Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life? Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table.

    Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    Has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.


    http://s747.photobucket.com/user/TheBBWolf/media/wsqzb8.jpg.html?o=1

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U36fCE_vCE

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiPR0zdPU0I

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=silF8UT4mTE

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gyr5XsOufw

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpd20QWRNvQ

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jay, good point.

    How is a male Syrian, 18, uneducated,and with average IQ of mid 80's going to save Germany?

    Why does Germany believe itself the world's "savior"?

    Look at what its attitude towards Greece was, and what its attitude towards migrants is...

    how does she rectify this?

    ReplyDelete
  3. are the leaders of the european countries so imbecile as to let these demons flow in ? don't they know the consequences ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Not sure you are correct. Revolutions are made by young people, not by pensioners. And european populations are getting quite old. The median age in Germany is 46 years. Birth rates of white europeans are even lower than the birth rates of white americans. The fertility rate in Germany is a disaster - 1.3 per native german woman. You need at least 2.1 to keep the population at one level. And many among the few youngsters are already not european. So who is going to make this revolution if there are few young people, and many of them are already not german?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good points Passer by, feminism, short term consumer gratification and belief that the state will support in old age all contribute to low birth rates. Demography is destiny and at least western Europe is dying. There may be resistance in parts of eastern Europe, but I expect most of Europe to accept the transformation of their societies.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Passer, I would love to be wrong about how this whole thing ends...

    These people are obedient to the Koran, and quote it as they kill.

    ReplyDelete